Catalog record · Compliance & Regulatory
Stage as of May 6, 2025 · historical report, not live reconfirmation.
Supervised small-debt recovery from pre-action correspondence through trial preparation
Primary workflow source. A named organization's workflow supported by a reviewed primary source. Stage is reported separately; this label does not establish measured outcomes or independent validation.
Last researched Oct 29, 2026. Source access and reported stage are recorded below; deployment evidence does not establish ROI.
What the research supports
The regulator describes client approval before each step, named solicitor accountability and no relevant-case-law proposals. A later provider case reports actual correspondence, proceedings, evidence and witness-statement/bundle preparation, with human barristers at trial.
- Reported stage
- Production
- Technology
- Other supported technology
- Business function
- Not assessed
- Impact (legacy label)
- Not labeled
- Catalog date · unconfirmed
- Not reported
- Imported
- Oct 29, 2026
- Last researched
- Oct 29, 2026
Measures & evidence
No quantified measure recorded. This is a gap in the evidence, not a finding of no value.
Documented vendor relationships
No vendor relationship has been linked to this specific workflow in the curated overlay. This does not mean it was built without vendors.
See the company’s documented relationshipsDeployment evidence & limits
Production — regulator authorized 2025-05-06 release; provider reports a completed 2026-05-14 trial in 2026-06-22 account. Status as of 2025-05-06.
Stage is as reported in the cited evidence. Current operating status has not been independently reconfirmed; the research date is an editorial review date.
Authorization establishes the supervised service model, not empirical accuracy. Trial success is provider-reported and depended on human advocacy; no independent judgment text retrieved. England/Wales small-claim practice is not authorization for regulated consumer debt collection, other jurisdictions or autonomous litigation. No win-rate or representative cost evidence follows from one matter.
Potential FS application · inferred
Inference: narrow B2B receivables dispute preparation and document assembly with explicit authority for each legal action. Missing capability: enforce scope exclusions and approval transitions as part of the workflow.
Inference: narrow B2B receivables dispute preparation and document assembly with explicit authority for each legal action. Missing capability: enforce scope exclusions and approval transitions as part of the workflow.
Original industry: Legal services. Transfer limits: England/Wales small-claim practice is not authorization for regulated consumer debt collection, other jurisdictions or autonomous litigation. No win-rate or representative cost evidence follows from one matter.
Source register
- SRA approves first AI-driven law firmsra.org.uk · opens in a new tab
Solicitors Regulation Authority · regulator · full-text · Published 2025-05-06
- AI Lawyer in Historic First Court Trial Wingarfield.law · opens in a new tab
Garfield AI · issuer · full-text · Published 2026-06-22
Research lanes: healthcare_legal_transfer · Batch global-discovery-2026-10-29. Coverage and remaining gaps